I’ve been looking for a reasonable explanation for this for a while and literally cannot find one. SO help me understand, please. ❤️🤷♀️
In: 42
So politicians can brag about how great things are when they are not and so companies can say inflation is low when it is not so they don’t have to give big raises. This is an honest and accurate response. I think we all know and realize those three items should be included because they make up the majority of most people monthly budget.
So politicians can brag about how great things are when they are not and so companies can say inflation is low when it is not so they don’t have to give big raises. This is an honest and accurate response. I think we all know and realize those three items should be included because they make up the majority of most people monthly budget.
So politicians can brag about how great things are when they are not and so companies can say inflation is low when it is not so they don’t have to give big raises. This is an honest and accurate response. I think we all know and realize those three items should be included because they make up the majority of most people monthly budget.
I did a quick search and couldn’t find something to validate this but what I recall hearing is;
Its excluded because those things have price changes that are to volatile and keeps an accurate calculation from being made.
But I thought there was some time we had run away inflation and they just changed the calculation so it could be reported that it wasn’t as high. I think its garbage they don’t get calculated. I would say at this point houses are not going to drop to 1990 prices so we should be safe putting them in the formula to get a better picture.
Hopefully Cunningham’s law is still a core rule of the internet and somebody will weigh in that knows more.
I did a quick search and couldn’t find something to validate this but what I recall hearing is;
Its excluded because those things have price changes that are to volatile and keeps an accurate calculation from being made.
But I thought there was some time we had run away inflation and they just changed the calculation so it could be reported that it wasn’t as high. I think its garbage they don’t get calculated. I would say at this point houses are not going to drop to 1990 prices so we should be safe putting them in the formula to get a better picture.
Hopefully Cunningham’s law is still a core rule of the internet and somebody will weigh in that knows more.
I did a quick search and couldn’t find something to validate this but what I recall hearing is;
Its excluded because those things have price changes that are to volatile and keeps an accurate calculation from being made.
But I thought there was some time we had run away inflation and they just changed the calculation so it could be reported that it wasn’t as high. I think its garbage they don’t get calculated. I would say at this point houses are not going to drop to 1990 prices so we should be safe putting them in the formula to get a better picture.
Hopefully Cunningham’s law is still a core rule of the internet and somebody will weigh in that knows more.
Adding to what others have said here, there is a reason to take out volatile items. If you are looking at long term inflation, say last year versus the prior year, then the volatility doesn’t cloud your analysis, So you look at inflation measures that are broad and include everything.
But if you want to know if inflation this month is higher, when the data comes out in a couple of weeks, then it makes sense to strip out the volatile items. The number is more likely to reflect the actual trend.
The volatile items move both ways. Take food. Leaving out the issue as to whether the egg companies are conspiring to keep egg prices high (that is possible based on research I have read) food prices bounce around due to short term market forces. This has always been true, just bigger variance around a trend.
But it is nice to know both numbers. If the core inflation number is +5.0% but the inflation number with all the volatile components is 7.0%, I want to know why the volatile components are so high. Take those eggs. I would have a point of view as to whether the price situation will resolve itself and so maybe the higher number shouldn’t be an issue in looking at March.
Adding to what others have said here, there is a reason to take out volatile items. If you are looking at long term inflation, say last year versus the prior year, then the volatility doesn’t cloud your analysis, So you look at inflation measures that are broad and include everything.
But if you want to know if inflation this month is higher, when the data comes out in a couple of weeks, then it makes sense to strip out the volatile items. The number is more likely to reflect the actual trend.
The volatile items move both ways. Take food. Leaving out the issue as to whether the egg companies are conspiring to keep egg prices high (that is possible based on research I have read) food prices bounce around due to short term market forces. This has always been true, just bigger variance around a trend.
But it is nice to know both numbers. If the core inflation number is +5.0% but the inflation number with all the volatile components is 7.0%, I want to know why the volatile components are so high. Take those eggs. I would have a point of view as to whether the price situation will resolve itself and so maybe the higher number shouldn’t be an issue in looking at March.
Adding to what others have said here, there is a reason to take out volatile items. If you are looking at long term inflation, say last year versus the prior year, then the volatility doesn’t cloud your analysis, So you look at inflation measures that are broad and include everything.
But if you want to know if inflation this month is higher, when the data comes out in a couple of weeks, then it makes sense to strip out the volatile items. The number is more likely to reflect the actual trend.
The volatile items move both ways. Take food. Leaving out the issue as to whether the egg companies are conspiring to keep egg prices high (that is possible based on research I have read) food prices bounce around due to short term market forces. This has always been true, just bigger variance around a trend.
But it is nice to know both numbers. If the core inflation number is +5.0% but the inflation number with all the volatile components is 7.0%, I want to know why the volatile components are so high. Take those eggs. I would have a point of view as to whether the price situation will resolve itself and so maybe the higher number shouldn’t be an issue in looking at March.
They don’t, there are two measures, core and non-core. Food and gas e.g. are very volatile and therefore aren’t included in core cpi.
Latest Answers