Zero is net zero, however .5 is *not* zero, therefore a rounding factor is *more accurate* than no factor, or no accounting for the factor (in a case of say 1.205 being rounded to 1.21)
Anonymous 0
Comments
Zero is net zero, however .5 is *not* zero, therefore a rounding factor is *more accurate* than no factor, or no accounting for the factor (in a case of say 1.205 being rounded to 1.21)
Anonymous 0
Comments
There has to be a convention, even if it’s arbitrary. We have chosen upwards.
However it does make some sense. All the other decimals 0.5xxx are greater than half so go upwards. For consistency therefore, 0.5000 ought to also.
Anonymous 0
Comments
There has to be a convention, even if it’s arbitrary. We have chosen upwards.
However it does make some sense. All the other decimals 0.5xxx are greater than half so go upwards. For consistency therefore, 0.5000 ought to also.
Latest Answers