For example, just saw a video of a lathe machining a chess piece. The final product was much smaller than the starting piece. Why do you start with such large pieces of stock for small projects? Wouldn’t it be smarter and more efficient to rough cut using cnc or water jet then finish?
In: Engineering
When figuring out how to approach a machining job, either on a lathe or other machine, there’s a lot of things to consider. If you’re starting with a normal bar of material, those only come in certain standard sizes. Plus, material costs money, so for hobby work it’s not uncommon to use a leftover from a previous project, even if it’s not an ideal size or shape for what you’re trying to make. That logic even sometimes applies to oddball one off jobs in industry, but much less frequently.
Next is order of operations and work holding. You need some amount of material to be able to hold the part, and you need to hold it sufficiently well to be able to resist the cutting forces. So maybe you need to cut a blank some amount longer than the part you want to make so you have some material in your chuck jaws. Otherwise you risk the part flying out and hitting you at worst. Maybe it just shifts, and you scrap the part by cutting something you didn’t want to. And work holding only gets more complicated as you remove more material. It’s easy enough to stick an oversized saw cut disc in a 3 jaw chuck, or a block in a vise. But now you need to flip it over, and make sure everything on this next side lines up properly with what you’ve already done. If you thought ahead, maybe you intentionally used a larger piece of material so you could give yourself something to hold onto, especially on smaller parts. Or maybe you used that extra material to give yourself a feature you could use to locate something else, like having a reamed hole for pin to indicate off of.
Latest Answers