There are two main reasons. The first is that a roadside breath test only detects alcohol but a driver can be impaired by other substances.
The second is that the actual results of a roadside breathalyzer are generally inadmissible in a criminal trial outside of specific circumstances. Normally an officer can only testify that the PBT detected the presence of alcoholic beverage, not the actual number. I was a local cop at two different agencies, neither issued PBTs for this reason.
Case law in the US considers the roadside olympics to be more accurate than the roadside breath test.
Latest Answers