Why does Vermont flood more than New Hampshire?

199 views

I’ve lived in New Hampshire my entire life and whenever we get ridiculous amounts of rain (Hurricane Irene, right now) I always hear about Vermont getting washed away while we have some sporadic bad flooding here in New Hampshire. Is there a reason (like terrain) that Vermont floods so much more than us? Or is it that it has happened to flood more in my short 21 years of life?

*My heart goes out to the Vermonters here right now* 💙

In: 66

5 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

I suspect, but don’t have a good way to categorically confirm, that VT has more towns and roads built in valleys around/along rivers than NH does. And a lot more of those are located in the heart mountainous areas compared to NH.

Consider where the major mill towns are in NH. Most are in the southern part of the state and closer to the coast where the terrain is more flat, so heavy rain can spread more instead of being channeled into a couple rivers. Yes there are plenty of small towns in the white mountains, but the northern half of NH is surrounded by mountains in all it’s neighbors, which helps a ton with knocking excess water out of storms before they get to that area. NH also has more lakes that rivers drain into which helps aborb the events.

VT has a ton of towns built in the valleys of the green mountains, most built around rivers. Unlike NH there really aren’t big lakes to absorb larger rain events, instead you get all that water trying to funnel down into the valleys into the same river and it just can’t deal with the volume of water, so it over flows and takes out the roads and towns. Consider just how long the Winooski River is, and how many towns are built along it, and how many mountains funnel into it between it’s start and stop without any major bodies of water to help absorb big rain events. Same with the mad river and white river further south.

Now consider the white mountain area. There is the pemigewasset River running along side I-93, but most of that is a wider valley and it doesn’t have to go far to find lakes to empty to. 302 has the saco River, and also barely any towns built along it. 16 through the heart of the mountains also has few towns along it. Most of the larger towns in northern NH are built on the edges of the mountains where things “flatten” out a little, they aren’t tucked into the valleys of the heart of the mountains. And most of the big mountains have small lakes at their bases that can take large rainfall, like echo and profile lake at Canon, and the entire lakes region just south of the white mountains.

Basically VT takes the brunt of storms that come in from the west, often loaded with moisture from the great lakes, and their geography doesn’t allow larger rain events to drain out as efficiently. Combined with more towns in the valleys and it just works out worse.

You are viewing 1 out of 5 answers, click here to view all answers.