One of the main reasons was, that after the war, there were barely any people around who weren’t at least passive supporters of the nazis. That meant, any job (that included making and enforcing of law) was very, very likely to be done by a former active nazi or at least a supporter of nazis of some kind. These people were not very likely to prosecute their peers.
When those people slowly made way for a new generation, a lot of evidence had already been lost or largely obscured, which made it hard for those prosecuting.
All in all, it’s hard to right a wrong of those proportions.
how can someone be convicted of a crime almost 80 years after the fact purely based on old records? surely any witnesses can’t be reliable. genuine question. surely there’s a statute of limitations. Also weren’t Germans effectively forced into working in these camps. No I don’t sympathize I’m just interested in a legal sense
Because the CIA rescued thousands of them and helped them flee to the US, Canada, and various countries in South America, where many of them lived under assumed identities. You can read more about it in the books Blowback by Christopher Simpson, Quiet Neighbors by Allan Ryan, and The Nazis Next Door by Eric Lichtblau.
Fun fact: quite a lot of former nazis were assigned as leading officers for the Bundeswehr, when Germany joined the NATO in 1955.
To put it in Germany’s first chancellor’s words:
What else do you want me to do? Do you want me to send 15 years old kids as generals to the NATO?
There were a LOT of posts in Germany that were filled with former Nazis. Army officers, lawyers, judges, police officers, etc.
All those posts were required, and Germany didn’t have any other options to fill those spots.
Latest Answers