It seems that for the last couple decades fusion is always 30 years away and by this point we’ve well passed the initial 30 and seemingly little progress has been made.
Is it just that it’s so difficult to make efficient?
Has the technology improved substantially and we just don’t hear about it often?
In: Physics
Because it’s a carrot on a stick, I’m convinced the science is flawed (trying to shove a square peg through a round hole). This is just my personal opinion, but my theory is that the scientific model is flawed & the research went off track at some point.
Without going back to the ‘basics’ and going down a different path of thinking it takes much longer. I think there is a totally different scientific approach that will yield far better results in the long run. We should be looking into what Tesla was doing, frequency, energy, vibration, etc.
I think the *real* groundbreaking science is being done in secret and is purposely kept away from global science as we know it. My hunch is the mainstream scientific community has been led on a wild goose chase (when it comes to breakthrough science)
Latest Answers