Why is it a bad idea to buy a home and sell it after a few years instead of renting?

1.61K viewsEconomicsOther

I have this impression that it’s seen as a riskier decision to buy a home, knowing you won’t live in it long enough to pay off the mortgage and then sell it when you’re ready to move away, when compared to renting a home. Am I off base on that, and if so, why is this the case?

In: Economics

32 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

As well as cost of the house, there are fees as well. You will be charged:
* Solicitor fees
* Mortgage fees (you get a better deal if you pay a £1k upfront cost)
* Mortgage arrangement fees
* Stamp duty (for houses over £250,000)
* Valuation fees
* Building surveyor fees
* Estate agent fees
* Electronic Funds Transfer fees
* Homebuyer’s insurance fees
* Insurance fees
* Council tax (you, rather than the landlord now needs to pay)

In short, there are LOT of expenses you have to suck up when buying a house. If you were buying a house worth £300,000 and it was going to be your only house, you’d have to pay an additional £2,500 in stamp duty to the government. If you move house a few times in your lifetime, you just have to suck up those costs, if you do it regularly, then you need to move into a wreck of a house, do it up and sell it for more than it’s worth for those costs to be worth it.

You are viewing 1 out of 32 answers, click here to view all answers.