Several good answers already explain practical difficulties of cooling. There is a more fundamental asymmetry in nature, however. In a nutshell, any organized form of energy can be fully turned into heat, while the reverse process is not possible. This allows many ways for heating, but not for cooling.
For example, we can burn fuel to make something very hot. But the opposite process does not happen spontaneously — it is not possible to sprinkle a hot object with ashes such that the ashes would spontaneously turn back into fuel while cooling the object.
For the same reason, a microwave oven can easily heat food, but there is no way to undo the process and turn all the heat back into electricity.
Physically it’s the same: heat travels to cold or cold soaks up heat (positive energy flow vs negative energy flow). The equations are the same.
A key variable in those equations though is the temperature gradient (C). Our technology to cool things is limited to around the point where water freezes, say 50 degrees cooler than whatever we’re trying to cool. Conversely our technology to generate heat easily reaches hundreds of degrees warmer, and with minimal effort thousands of degrees warmer.
The net effect is we can produce 10-100x higher gradient for heating from ambient temperature than cooling from ambient temperature.
Just looking at a standard kitchen here. An oven gets up to 500F, a freezer gets down to 0F. Room temperature is 70F. One of the biggest things that affects how quickly something changes temperature is the difference between it’s temperature and the temperature of what’s heating/cooling it.
So say you have a cup of water at room temperature and you put it in the oven at 400F. That’s a difference of 400-70=330F. Take the same cup of water and put it in the freezer and the difference is 70-0=70F.
Because of the much lower difference in temperature, the water is going to cool in the freezer much more slowly than it heats in the oven.
Heat is by definition ceaseless random motion in the molecules of an object. If you add energy to the object, you get heat (or acceleration but we’re not talking about that).
Now energy is a thing. You can point to it and say hey look there is energy.
Lack of energy, in contrast does not exist. Cold is a lack of energy. You cannot pump cold into a thing.
Thus, if you have energy you can put it in an object. There’s nothing you can put into an object to make it colder so the process of cooling things is much more passive. You have to connect the object to something that will take the energy away.
It’s just a more complicated process.
Heat is the presence of kinetic energy it the atoms. Coldness is the absence of that energy.
To heat something up you just need to subject it to some concentrated energy source like a fire, or microwaves, or a laser. To do the converse, to suck the existing energy out of something once it’s there, is not done so easily.
Alright kiddo, let’s think step by step:
1. Everything around us has tiny moving particles called molecules.
2. When we heat things, we’re giving those molecules more energy, and they move faster.
3. When we cool things, we want those molecules to slow down and give away their energy.
4. It’s like trying to calm down a room full of bouncing balls; it’s easier to make them bounce more by throwing more balls in than to get them to stop bouncing.
So, heating things up is simpler than cooling them down. 😊
Latest Answers