I thought about this when a coworker mentioned in casual conversation that they wondered why a certain head of state (no reason to get into specifics) is not simply done away with to resolve a currently ongoing international conflict. To my knowledge that’s almost never done in the real world because it rarely works as intended. I was wondering if any politics/international relationship experts or avid Hitman/Assassin’s Creed players knows the real reason why this is, and if there’s even a official term for why this is not done in real politics? Thanks.
In: Other
The ‘knife and buldgeon’ method of regime change is alive and well in some places.
Also, you tried valiantly to avoid it, but it’s obvious to me you were talking about Rishi Sunak.
Latest Answers