Youtube doesn’t have a large competitor challenging it for market share like other major companies do. There are plenty of streaming services, but YouTube is the only game in town when it comes to people generally browsing video content and following their favorite creators.
Coca-Cola has Pepsi. McDonald’s has Burger King. Toyota has Honda. Why doesn’t YouTube have one?
In: Economics
Netflix proved, until media companies broke their back, that people don’t need and don’t want, many different video channels.
I have no desire to subscribe to Disney, and Paramount, and Hulu, and Prime, and ESPN, and and and. None. And screw the media companies for thinking that’s what people want and value.
What caused torrenting wasn’t greed for money, it was that getting the videos you want, where you want them, and when you want them, was impossible because Cable sucked.
Netflix stopped torrenting because everything was in one place.
Why isn’t there an alternative to YouTube? Why??
I don’t want to have it use Vimeo, and TikTok, and Instagram Stories, and and and. YouTube, thank goodness, focuses on having the most, freely available, and there is no media company to force it apart in some grand licensing money making scheme.
Latest Answers