Quoting from ‘Did Socrates “Teach New Deities”? Or: Homer’s Gods, Plato’s Gods* : a Public Talk by Dr. Jan Garrett
>’In Plato’s view, the gods are beings that have no difficulty perceiving the absolute ideals; the gods are not the standards of justice, beauty and goodness, but they are living beings who have perfect knowledge of these standards.’
I’ll try not to go too far into Non-ELI5 territory, but that’s kind of hard when speaking of philosophy, so I may not entirely succeed.
For clarity and context, in speaking of ‘the absolute ideals’, Dr. Garret is referring to Plato’s ‘theory of Forms’.
According to Plato, everything has two forms: the ‘ideal’ form, and the ‘real’ form. The ideal form is a thing’s inherent, unchangeable non-physical essence, while the ‘real’ form is an *imitation* of the ideal form.
Justice, beauty and goodness, then, derive from the unchangeable ‘ideal form’ of those concepts; while the gods are not *representative* of those ideal forms (that is, they’re not ‘perfect beings’), they are, by their nature, possessed of *perfect knowledge* of the ideal forms of those concepts.
So, while we can only perceive and experience a shallow imitation of ‘justice’ and ‘beauty’ and ‘goodness’, the gods are capable of comprehending the true, unchanging nature of those concepts, in their ideal forms.
I’m not sure I’m expressing myself properly; language is remarkably insufficient for discussing such immense concepts…
Latest Answers