In comparison to his contemporaries in English Literature?
In: Other
I asked the same question of the Beatles. Their best song isn’t 10 times better than the next band’s best song. But the Beatles are great because they do write great songs, because they were prolific, and because they spoke to many people in ways other bands didn’t. It’s quality x quantity x appeal. And now I think that they (basically) deserve the hype.
This is a way to think about Shakespeare. He did a lot of quality work, with some memorable hits, strong themes, and gorgeous language. In language, Shakespeare really is better than anyone else. Many titles of works by *other people* are ripped off of Shakespeare: *The Sound and the Fury, Infinite Jest, Brave New World, What Dreams May Come*.
The way to get into Shakespeare is the “No Fear” book series, which has the original language and a plain paraphrase side by side. Being able to read the play easily allows you to appreciate it, and then you can switch back for the big speeches and read the original language. The series also gives notes on the archaic terms that can really confuse the reader.
Also check out his sonnets. They might not blow your mind, but they are great traditional poetry that flow and stick to a meter / rhythm. They are much easier to follow than the plays and show a high level of skill in poetry. He might not be your favorite poet, but you will have a hard time finding someone doing much better in the same style.
Latest Answers