Why the quad-rotor configuration has not been adopted as an actual aircraft?

1.61K viewsEngineeringOther

Quadrotor configuration I think is the most common configuration for drones. Why has it not been made into a full-size production aircraft? I think that it could be better than helicopters as it does not need a tail.

In: Engineering

29 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

Quadrotor drones with fixed pitch propellers are cheap to manufacture and light enough that electric power is viable

Such designs only work with electric or hydraulic power – a traditional engine cannot spin up or down fast enough to make a quadrotor work.

By contrast, things like variable pitch propellers are very expensive for drone sized platforms….. So you really only want 1 or 2 if you are doing that, which means helicopter….

Electric power doesn’t scale up – the weight of batteries and multiple motors quickly becomes too heavy for efficient flight.

Also full sized aircraft aren’t as cost constrained as hobby drones.

So when you are doing a full size aircraft it’s easier to use variable pitch constant speed rotors…. And since you aren’t trying to use differential thrust for control you only need 1 or 2 of them, and when you do that you have a helicopter.

You are viewing 1 out of 29 answers, click here to view all answers.