Why were the camouflage uniforms (green, brown, yellow) adopted so late? When it seems that it would be pretty obvious that a soldier would die less often in the field if he’s harder to spot? Even in WW1 French were still wearing bright blue and red uniforms?
In: 23
Before the modern era, most warfare was conducted by troops who simply did what they were commanded by middle to senior level officers; Often the general directed a large part of the operation himself through flags, trumpets, and messengers. Little initiative was expected of the lowest level troops.
Because senior people needed to see the soldiers and their movements (sometimes from a distance), clearly marked uniforms and people carrying banners were essential.
Over time, small arms increased in range and accuracy and indirect fire weapons, started to be targeted using balloon and aircraft spotters. Colonial powers also had to manage large areas with smaller units of troops on patrols. These situations encouraged “not being seen”,* so armies started to camouflage their soldiers and equipment. This dramatically change the nature of warfare from “charges” across a field to small unit actions, trying to stay out of sight.
This transition started after the Crimean war, really gaining speed through WW-1 and was solidly in-place for many of the worlds military’s before WW-2.
* See “How Not to be Seen” as a guide to the importance of hiding well.
Before the modern era, most warfare was conducted by troops who simply did what they were commanded by middle to senior level officers; Often the general directed a large part of the operation himself through flags, trumpets, and messengers. Little initiative was expected of the lowest level troops.
Because senior people needed to see the soldiers and their movements (sometimes from a distance), clearly marked uniforms and people carrying banners were essential.
Over time, small arms increased in range and accuracy and indirect fire weapons, started to be targeted using balloon and aircraft spotters. Colonial powers also had to manage large areas with smaller units of troops on patrols. These situations encouraged “not being seen”,* so armies started to camouflage their soldiers and equipment. This dramatically change the nature of warfare from “charges” across a field to small unit actions, trying to stay out of sight.
This transition started after the Crimean war, really gaining speed through WW-1 and was solidly in-place for many of the worlds military’s before WW-2.
* See “How Not to be Seen” as a guide to the importance of hiding well.
The nature of war changed drastically and dramatically in a very short period of time at the turn of the century. WWI was a war that nobody expected to turn out as it did. Many new technologies that didn’t exist a few years prior were utilised to completely change how wars were fought. Airplanes, cars/trucks, machine guns, chemical warfare and tanks all changed how a war is fought and how armies need to be structured and trained to fight it.
Long story short, prior to the 20th century being able to easily spot and distinguish friendly units from enemy ones was much more important than being camouflaged against the enemy. This was due to the lack of means of communications like radios, the nature of how battles were fought with closely grouped units firing at each other from a distance and the main deciding factor of a battle’s victor being the amount of firepower they had.
The nature of war changed drastically and dramatically in a very short period of time at the turn of the century. WWI was a war that nobody expected to turn out as it did. Many new technologies that didn’t exist a few years prior were utilised to completely change how wars were fought. Airplanes, cars/trucks, machine guns, chemical warfare and tanks all changed how a war is fought and how armies need to be structured and trained to fight it.
Long story short, prior to the 20th century being able to easily spot and distinguish friendly units from enemy ones was much more important than being camouflaged against the enemy. This was due to the lack of means of communications like radios, the nature of how battles were fought with closely grouped units firing at each other from a distance and the main deciding factor of a battle’s victor being the amount of firepower they had.
Latest Answers