Why weren’t cannons on wooden ships aimed downwards to destroy the keel?

541 views

I’m sure the answer will be obvious, but would have guessed sinking would have been beneficial over just destroying a ships sailing ability. At least from what I’ve been able to find.

In: 21

12 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

Two reasons:

1) Imagine throwing an apple at someone who is sitting just under the surface in a swimming pool. The moment your apple hits the water, it’s going to immediately slow down. If it hits them at all, they’ll barely feel it because the moving apple loses so much of its energy to the water. In exactly the same way, even if you could get a good shot that doesn’t just skim on the water, it will lose most of its energy before it hits your target.

2) Generally, no one wanted to sink the ships they were fighting. If you disabled a ship, then you could take it with you as a prize – ships were worth a great deal of money and governments would pay prize money for captured enemy ships. Shooting at the rigging or rudder left a ship unable to manouvre, but readily repairable once it was captured, but a shot under the waterline could sink it.

You are viewing 1 out of 12 answers, click here to view all answers.