Why weren’t cannons on wooden ships aimed downwards to destroy the keel?

537 views

I’m sure the answer will be obvious, but would have guessed sinking would have been beneficial over just destroying a ships sailing ability. At least from what I’ve been able to find.

In: 21

12 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

The main aim in most navies was to take the ship and cargo. The idea was to hit mast and sails at range to prevent maneuvering, then close in a arc where your guns hit and their’s are limited to sweep the deck clear if they haven’t given up.
This was due to fact that a ship claimed as prize was sold and a large percentage was given to the captain and crew. This could be a fortune, a few years pay in some cases.
Britain brought in paying a bounty for a ship that was sunk. This allowed them to fire into hull and risk sinking the ship but more effective in forcing a surrender with less risk as guns and crews destroyed.

Shooting at the keel the lowest part is a non started and everyone knew that. The wounded and gunpowder were kept in the lowest part to protect them from cannon fire.

You are viewing 1 out of 12 answers, click here to view all answers.