(I’m American) Inflation is the rising cost of goods and services. Inflation constantly goes up by varying degrees. When economists say “inflation is decreasing”, that just means that the rate of inflation has slowed, not that inflation reversed.
If inflation is causing money to be less valuable over time, why would it be bad to have deflation? Would that not make my money more valuable? I’ve been told it would be very bad, but not in a way that I understand
In: Economics
For money to work you need it moving (people using it).
The threat of money losing value (inflation) makes you do something with it. Buy things you want, or invest your money (allowing other people to use it).
If everyone thinks money increases in value over time, money stops moving. Because you would use as little as possible in an attempt to hoard as much as you can.
This would mean no incentive for competition. No incentive to start a business. No incentive to invest.
It would be a feedback loop that quicky implodes and destroys money and our way of life.
Most people will give you an explanation framed from a macroeconomic perspective. I thought it would also help to give a more personal perspective.
Deflation means your money becomes more valuable over time: it takes less money to buy comparable goods.
For most goods and services, businesses would try to compensate to balance things out so that the time it took you to earn enough to buy something stays about the same. So things might cost less, but you’re also being paid less.
But not everyone can do that. Most notably, when it comes to debt or other fixed cost agreements, you’re still on the hook for the agreed upon amount.
Deflation is thus bad for debtors. You’re making less money, but your debt is staying the same. It would be like paying today’s price, but on your grandparents’ wages.
Conversely, inflation is good for debtors because that’s like getting paid today’s wages to pay your grandparents’ mortgage.
I think the issue that’s causing you to talk past people here is the idea of microeconomics vs macroeconomics. You’re talking about your personal life and what decisions you might make or how you would directly interact with the economy. This is very different from the large scale economic activity of an entire country.
Deflation would be the result of demand growing slower than supply, and so suppliers reducing prices in order to sell their stock.
The problem is them having less revenue to cover their costs. Eventually they’re going to go into survival mode, ie. cutting their costs. The largest cost is usually labour costs – and so job layoffs occur.
As more people lose jobs, theres less people buying stuff, and so prices go down even further.
This is basically a recession and a shrinking economy. Less demand for goods means less need for jobs.
Overall, people will begrudgingly accept that prices will go up. Being unemployed is far less tolerable.
Money’s loss of value is intentional. It’s just paper, metal coins and numbers on screen. But in being spent and triggering a need for more goods and services, along with investing into businesses, it creates jobs – and tax revenue that comes as a result of economic activity. Money isn’t printed for the purposes of hoarding.
Latest Answers