Does a youtube video with a still image (ex. music) drain as much mobile data as a moving video (gameplay, etc.), and why/why not?
In: 457
In theory no… although to be more specific it depends a lot on how the video is compressed either by uploader or Youtube for downstreaming. But in general, a static image w/ audio will be less.
In uncompressed raw formats almost every frame of video could be considered a complete static image. So a 1080p video frame is a 1920 x 1080 pixel image, so a 2 073 600 or ~2 megapixel image. Every frame. So the byte size of this is however many bits per pixel. 2Megapixels x 1 byte per pixel = 2 MB per frame. At 30 frames per second, well that’s 60 MB per second.
Which is a lot. So video is normally compressed and one of the easy way to get reasonably high compression is to send a “key” frame – which is a complete whole resolution frame – every once in a while, but for intervening frames just send the pixels that “change”. Obviously for a video steam which is a static image, the “changed pixels” information is essentially nothing. So much less data.
Then you have those Youtube music videos with a static background but its slowly panning around or slowly zooming in and out? depending on how the video is encoded and compressed, there might be encoding tricks like “this frame is just like last, but everything is shifted one pixel up” type of things, but because of the motion, its going to be somewhere in between our two extremes.
(edit: been a long time since my video days; as others have pointed out its a lot more bytes per pixel and more frames per second, so a lot more MB/s, but point remains w/o compression video is really fcking big data wise.)
Latest Answers