Buying a company out generally just means buying up enough stock to have a controlling vote. In this way the larger company’s stakeholders can control the actions of the company without it necessarily being part of the same organization the way a wholly owned subsidiary would be. Given the legal freedom to do so, which doesn’t exist in every country, they may then vote to sell the assets, intellectual property and so on to the larger company at a sweetheart rate and dissolve the smaller company in order to consolidate, or they may just carry on using it as a de facto subsidiary that works to the larger company’s benefits. This gets into the stereotypical “hostile takeover” of 80’s business movie fame.
That doesn’t necessarily mean that previous major stakeholders, like maybe the board or founders of the smaller company, don’t still have a significant number of shares. If the smaller company continues to operate “buying it back” would just be a matter of acquiring enough shares to regain a controlling percentage as an individual or as a group of individuals. This happens occasionally as investment. An investment firm can buy up controlling interest in a company, install their preferred CEO and inject some capital to increase the company’s profitability and value, then divest themselves of the stock at (they hope) a large profit and use that to move on to the next company. It’s something like flipping houses. Who buys up that stock doesn’t much matter to them if they make a good profit or (at times) can cut their losses to move on to better opportunities. It could go to the market as an IPO if it was privately held before, it could be sold back to another investor or, in VERY rare cases, previous owners might buy it back.
Latest Answers