Essentially, the title says it all. How do some lawyers make such a difference in the outcome of a trial when defending clients accused of crimes? The evidence is the same regardless of the lawyer, so it doesn’t seem like they should have that much power over the verdict.
In: 32
Evidence is the same, but interpretation of the evidence is not. Not to mention they have teams on that case unlike a public defender which is probably weighed down on many cases.
Latest Answers