Essentially, the title says it all. How do some lawyers make such a difference in the outcome of a trial when defending clients accused of crimes? The evidence is the same regardless of the lawyer, so it doesn’t seem like they should have that much power over the verdict.
In: 32
It’s like asking 2 different people to sell you the same pen. They’re both trying to convince you why you should trust them and buy it from them. The more confident speaking one who knows how to manipulate the evidence to their advantage is more likely to win over the judge / jury.
Latest Answers