[eli5] Why did humans advance so far so fast while other intelligent animals did not?

466 views

[eli5] Why did humans advance so far so fast while other intelligent animals did not?

In: 944

22 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

We don’t know. Some of us like to guess. Some of us get angry when others disagree with our guesses.

Anonymous 0 Comments

It’s not that we advanced faster. We just advanced differently. We still suck at things other species are great at.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Not really if you think in absolute terms. For a long time we didn’t do much in terms of advancement 4.4 million years ago the first human descendant showed up. That dwarves the last 6000 years of recorded history and the 300+ years of rapid scientific achievements.

But to answer your question there where a few things that combined brought us a lot of benefits compared to other species:
* bipedal (standing up)
* Opposable thumbs that allow us to grab on to things like tools.
* Very big (compared to body size) and rugged brains (meaning more space for more brain cells)
* Brain that dwarfed on some areas to allow for speech (probably biggest advantage imo)
* omnivorous diet
* having the ability to domesticate animals and plant plants
* pattern recognition and curiosity
* (later on)symbiosis with wolves
* history telling, writing, books, press and internet

All of these combined gave us a pretty decent ability to adapt to various scenarios. But in the end the advancements come from being able to learn and build on top of previous knowledge. We wouldn’t be able to come this far if we had to reinvent the wheel every time. That is what makes advancement

Anonymous 0 Comments

Our social intelligence was the most important factor *by far*. Groups of humans meant that many more babies could actually survive delivery and adolescence which is exceedingly rare in nature, because youngsters are the most vulnerable. It allowed us to coordinate with each other and combine our ideas. If one of your friends notices that fire makes food taste good, you don’t need to fight with him like wild animals would. Instead, you two take your ideas to others and say “Hey, spread the word that fire is good!”, and before long you would have a flourishing community of healthy people as opposed to competition with another group *over* fire. This allowed our intelligence to increase tenfold. No other animal on Earth even comes close to matching us in intelligence, the best averaging no more than the intelligence of human babies.

As for why this developed, we’re not really sure. Few species of animals exhibit social cooperation. Our guesses indicate that the African environment was harsh enough that those that didn’t band together died, while those that did survived and promoted social interaction.

There’s another famous animal that is well known for its social skills. Can you guess what it was? Wolves. And we made them our pets. The hardy auroch is another example, but they didn’t take our “food tame” approach as well and would instead attack us on sight. So, we hunted them into extinction.

There are also some other physical traits, like sweating. Humans are the most heat efficient animals on the planet, because we use water to cool off. Nearly every other species has to rest or sit in shade. So it’s no surprise that humans are the best endurance runners on the planet. You don’t need to be as fast as a cheetah, but if you can run 10x further than it on the same day, you’ve got pretty good odds.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Modern warfare created most if not all the technologies that are used commercially today. All other animals kill to eat and survive

Anonymous 0 Comments

There are a lot of reasons, one being that we developed a language to do more complex communications compared to other species.
Also, fire, agriculture and many more.
I’m pretty sure you will love Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Cooking! We learned to combine and consume much more nutrients in faster sittings than other animals. While others spend most of their day grazing or searching for food, we collected it, combined it and consumed it while staying mobile. More nutrients equals more calories for our brains to use.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Another thing to add to the other reasons why we are successful is that we have domesticated ourselves. We underwent changes similar to the dog during its domestication. The fact that we are able to trade and cooperate with groups outside of family is one of the pieces of the puzzle of human dominance of Earth.

Here is an article that explains it better than I could. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/how-humans-maybe-domesticated-themselves

Anonymous 0 Comments

If you mean animals like chimps and dolphins, I think one of the first driving factors was cooking meat. It takes something like 70% less energy to digest cooked meat than raw. This executed energy went into building the brain which led to everything else.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Language enables us to do something no other animal can*: remember things after the death of the discoverer. This means that we’re not stuck where animals are stuck, spending a lot of effort and taking a lot of risks discovering, individually, a whole shit-ton of relevant information about the world.

At first, this effect looks marginal, because a lot of animals have more powerful and specific instincts than we do. And it would have been. Things would have moved very slowly. But then we get to “how to use a rock and a stick and teamwork to kill a predator” and shit, you just upended part of the local food chain in an afternoon.

Language allows discoveries (which, evolutionarily, are basically specific behavioural changes) to be propagated on non-evolutionary timescales, giving our rivals, prey and predators no time to respond. That’s how we moved so fast. We’re a natural disaster.

There’s a brilliant set of lectures called The Ape That Got Lucky that postulates mostly how we became linguistic animals, too – very much worth a listen.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ape_That_Got_Lucky

*there are very very weak and specific counterexamples of animals passing on knowledge about specific tasks; that they don’t do so linguistically but by action-copying is relevant here