Women’s bodies are already ‘designed’ to carry children with mismatching blood types.
The way pregnancy works already accounts for the issue, because even a natural pregnancy will have a mismatch; unless the baby has the same blood type, either the women’s blood wouldn’t work in the baby or vice versa.
The blood of the baby and the mother never actually interact. The placenta acts as a filter that facilitates the transfer of nutrients/oxygen from the mother and carbon dioxide/waste from the fetus, but the blood of each that transports the nutrients/waste never comes in contact with each other. Organs, in contrast, are directly in contact with the host blood supply, so incompatibility issues are severe.
As a result, babies and mothers can have different blood types – this is fairly common in normal pregnancies (I myself have a different blood type than my mother did).
There are _some_ diseases that can occur if the mothers have different blood types than their babies (particularly Rh factors) but they are uncommon.
The same reason they don’t matter when people have babies without the surrogate, parents’ blood doesn’t mix, and nor does the blood of the foetus with the mother’s. Placenta exchanges nutrients, oxygen/CO2 and waste products with the mother’s circulatory system, but blood cells never cross that barrier.
It’s not that it doesn’t matter, but it doesn’t matter as much.
The placenta is a filter between mother and child, so there is very little blood or tissue Mix between the two. There still can be issues relating to blood typing. Baby’s blood cells are detectable in the mother’s blood, that’s how current generation genetic tests on pre-term fetus work. So if there is a mismatch between mother and child it can cause illness or stress for either mother or child, but rarely is this stress a fatal issue.
Latest Answers