Source: I test disinfectants, and help write the European methods for disinfectants.
Some materials stop bacterial growth – metals like copper and silver. These materials are added in the making of the plastic. There is lots of evidence of this type of thing working to different degrees. Usually low level effect over time.
Liquid treatments much better than treated plastics but have a much shorter lifespan and wear out, some products claim to work for day months or years because they leave residues but there is now a growing body of evidence that shows this isn’t true and lab tests for disinfectants can’t accurately show the effects of wear on these products.
In most cases these types of product do do a little bit to help reduce bacteria but they are by no means sterile and this effect takes time, think of it as a bandade not a cure.
Marketing is the main reason nothing else
There is a material I remember reading about in a science journal many years ago. Essentially it was a coating that could be applied to just about any material that created tiny microscopic spikes.
In theory it was supposed to not allow microbes to survive on the surface. The spikes were a specific size which would kill anything on the surface. While also being small enough to be be able to pierce through the skin.
I seriously doubt that they are. I wonder where you even got that idea? Here’s something to consider: Even if the trays are completely sterile at the start of the day, even if they are soaked in Lysol and bathed in UV light, the first person in line may have walked through dog-shit, chewing-tobacco, and piss on his way from his car to the terminal. Then he puts his shoes in that tray. Then the tray goes round-and-round throughout the day to haul shoe after shoe after shoe. I don’t care what it’s made of, unless you clean it yourself or see it being cleaned, it isn’t clean or sterile in any way.
Latest Answers