I know I can just google the answer to this, but what I’m wondering is what exactly is the definition of an anatomically modern human? A human who can reproduce with a modern human? I’m wondering, if you go back 150,000 years and get a human from that time and raise them in modern society, would they be in any way different? Would anything give them away?
In: Biology
They’re at least 300,000 years old, and the definition is simply
“within the range of physical variation we see today”. Would an older anatomically modern human stand out in New York City? No. Not physically.
On reproduction: You’d have to go pretty far back to find a human who couldn’t make fertile offspring with humans today. Keep in mind horses and donkeys (which produce sterile mules) have a common ancestor about 5 million years ago. That’s a lot of divergence.
There is hot debate about cognitive capacity. Some say there would hardly be a difference, others say there would be an enormous difference. Most believe there would be some difference. We don’t know. Generally the older schools of thought in anthropology believed in a larger difference between the brains of people 300,000 years ago and those today, because archaeologists hadn’t found as many old artifacts yet. The ability to process language, in particular, is believed by some to have increased most significantly since 300,000 years ago as compared to problem-solving.
Latest Answers