Concerns about possible transmission to people drinking unpasteurized milk are being talked about a lot. Apparently they fed mice unpasteurized milk, and they got the virus, but it seems like the temperature required to kill. The virus is higher than what they used to sterilize the milk. How is this safe?
In: Biology
This new study shows that the time/temperature combinations most commonly used to pasteurize milk inactivate all or nearly all of the virus that is present, at least in the laboratory: [https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2405495](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2405495)
Also, this new study shows that no viable virus was present in 297 samples of pasteurized milk purchased at retail around the U.S. (although many of the samples had viral RNA present):
[https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.21.24307706v1](https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.21.24307706v1)
You know how you could probably live for quite a while in 130 degree heat (Fahrenheit), but eventually you’d probably die? And how at 150 degrees you’d probably die quicker? And if you were thrown into a 300 degree oven it wouldn’t take long at all?
It’s the same for bacteria and viruses. There’s a temperature they die at very quickly, but it held at somewhat lower temperatures for longer, they’ll still die.
You know how you’re supposed to cook chicken to 165 in order to kill the bacteria? That’s the temp where bacteria will die really quick. But you can safely cook it just to 145 degrees as long as it stays that hot for at least ten minutes.
Same concept for milk. It’s heat *and* time that factor into the equation.
Latest Answers