How is QUANTUM superposition mathematically/ontologically possible? Physics How is superposition mathematically/ontologically possible? Physics


And what exactly is it?

In: 3

5 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

It’s possible because it isn’t impossible. There is no rule in physics or math that says it is impossible, which means it’s possible.

And what it is, is basically saying that some subatomic particles can exist in different states at once.

For example, electrons have a property known as spin. Since they have spin they have direction (kind of like how the Earth spins and because of that, has a north and south pole). Since electrons have a direction, an electron can be “up” or “down.”

Superposition says its possible for an electron to be put into a state where it is both up *and* down at the same time, and will only definitely be one (and not the other) when it interacts with another particle.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Before we talk about what a superposition is, let’s talk about where it comes from namely the field of quantum mechanics. In quantom mechanics, outcomes are probably stick rather than deterministic as they are in Newtonian mechanics.

So what the heck did I just say? In Newtonian mechanics, we know exactly what the outcome of an event will be, we just need to calculate for the variables involved. When I throw a ball up in the air, we can predict exactly how high it will go, where it will land, and how fast it be going when it does.

Quantom mechanics is very different. In a quantum mechanical system, the exact outcome of an event is unknown. Using a model that is commonly discussed known as the double slit experiment as an example, when we fire a particle at the double slit we don’t know where the particle will land. Instead, what we know are the probabilities of the particle landing at any particular location. There is no guarantee where the particle will land, and every time we repeat the experiment there will be a different result ( more accurately the results will all fall within one of the expected possible outcomes, not that there will be a unique outcome for each individual experiment). This feature is at the very crux of what it means to be a quantum mechanical system. Now, quantom mechanics is very weird (VERY weird), and certain conditions such as observation can cause “the wave function to collapse” ( this is a reference to the Schrodinger wave function, the equation that is used to calculate the probabilities of certain events in a Quantum system) and a quantom system reverts back to a classical/Newtowian system.

Okay, so back to your question. What is a superposition? Well the simplest answer to that is that a superposition is what we call an event that is still in the probabilistic (ie undetermined) state. A superposition is what exists before a pesky observer gets curious and causes the wave function to collapse. A superposition, by definition, means multiple outcomes are possible and undetermined. How is it possible? Well, it’s possible because it makes accurate predictions about the world around us. Superpositions are not just a thought experiment, they’re not some theoretical abstract concept that only makes sense on paper. The Schrodinger wave function makes many predictable, measurable, verifiable predictions about particle interactions and is arguably at the very heart if what makes all chemistry work.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Wave particle duality. Everything acts like a wave unless it’s being observed (interacted with). Just like normal waves can interfere and overlap creating a superposition, the particle’s wave can be split into two states that overlap and create a superposition.

When we describe a particle as a wave, it’s basically the probability density of where the particle is.

Schrodingher’s cat is the go to example of this. There’s a 50% chance the cat is alive, 50% chance it’s dead. If we describe an alive cat as a wave function, and a dead cat as a wave function, we can add them together and get the wave function of our superposition cat. We can then take this superposition cat, and do all sorts of math on it. Let’s say we heat the box up a few degrees. Instead of taking the wave function of an alive cat and heating it up, taking the wave function of a dead cat and heating it up and then adding the two together, we can take our superposition wave function, heat it up and we get the same result. It’s a shortcut that only works because it behaves as a wave.

Once we open the box, we collapse the wave function, and the particle is essentially picking a random point (probably of each point determined by the wave function) and then the particle is there. If it helps you to think of it as a mathematical trick, then sure, you can have that, but it works like this in the real world or else the single photon double slit experiment and quantum tunneling wouldn’t work.

Anonymous 0 Comments

It’s the other way around – it’s not that mathematics proves that quantum superposition is possible, it’s that quantum superposition is the best explanation for what we observe in experiments.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Imagine you have a 5×5 grid. There are 25 possible positions on this grid, from (1, 1) to (5, 5). Our intuition tells us that something that exists on this grid has to exist at one of those positions, and importantly that it *does not* exist at any of the other positions. If the object you’re looking for as at (2, 4) you can say that there’s a 100% probability of finding it at that location and a 0% probability of finding it at any of the other locations.

But we find through observation that quantum particles betray our intuition. Instead of existing 100% at one location they instead consist of a probability distribution across all possible locations. Perhaps the object you’re looking for has a very high probability of being at (2, 4) but it will be less than 100%, and its probability of being in any of the other locations will be greater than 0%. The mathematical formula that describes the object’s range of possibilities across all of the locations is called its *wave function*.

But, of course, things on a macroscopic scale have to exist in specific locations because we interact with them at specific locations. So how do we bridge the probabilistic quantum world and the deterministic, macroscopic world we observe in everyday life? When a quantum particle (or quantum system) interacts with an *observer*, the wave function *collapses* and the observer experiences that quantum object at one specific location: it begins to behave in accordance with our intuition.

I’ll note here that “observer” is something of a misleading term. It really just means anything that needs the particle to have a definite value regardless of whether that thing is conscious or actively trying to observe the particle. It might be easier to just think of it as “the quantum system interacts with something else.”

So how then does a quantum object go from a smear of probabilities to something that has a definite value? What exactly *happens* when the wave function collapses, and what has actually changed about the quantum object? **We have no god damn idea.** This is kind of one of the big mysteries in physics right now. Our description of quantum mechanics is consistent with the behaviors we can observe but it doesn’t make any intuitive sense. We can’t really picture what it is. It’s sort of particle-like, sort of wave-like, and not entirely consistent with anything we can directly observe in the macroscopic world.

Well, in fairness, we have several ideas: the Copenhagen Interpretation, the Many Worlds Hypothesis, and others. We just can’t prove that any one of those is correct.