How is the case against crypto-cash intermediary Bankman-Fried different from a bank that couldn’t cover a “run on the bank”?

149 views

How is the case against crypto-cash intermediary Bankman-Fried different from a bank that couldn’t cover a “run on the bank”?

In: 10

9 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

The difference is that a bank would have records indicating to whom the money was currently loaned, or in what it was currently invested. They could account for all of their money

Bankman-Fried can’t tell the investors where the money, they’ve been told they earned, is, because it was never actually earned.

You are viewing 1 out of 9 answers, click here to view all answers.