How is the case against crypto-cash intermediary Bankman-Fried different from a bank that couldn’t cover a “run on the bank”?

150 views

How is the case against crypto-cash intermediary Bankman-Fried different from a bank that couldn’t cover a “run on the bank”?

In: 10

9 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

“Run on the bank” refers to when many people withdraw their money all at once. Although Bankman-Fried experienced that, it’s not why he’s in trouble. When a run happens, there tends to be an investigation on why it happened, and a check to see if the books are being kept properly. In his case….his books were shady AF. He had lent himself a billion without disclosing it to practically anyone, he’d lied to investors, he had irresponsibly incomplete records, and so on. So yes, there was a sudden rush to pull more cash than his company had on hand, but he’s only in trouble for the assumed crimes he committed to get to that point.

You are viewing 1 out of 9 answers, click here to view all answers.