How is the case against crypto-cash intermediary Bankman-Fried different from a bank that couldn’t cover a “run on the bank”?

145 views

How is the case against crypto-cash intermediary Bankman-Fried different from a bank that couldn’t cover a “run on the bank”?

In: 10

9 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

The difference is the reason FTX “couldn’t cover the run” was he was secretly passing money from FTX to Alameda Research, which then lost it in a series of risky trades.

The passing of money from his left hand to his right *is illegal*. And it was not disclosed to his customers.

You are viewing 1 out of 9 answers, click here to view all answers.