If so many sea animals evolve to “craboforms” because it is so evolutionarily advantageous, what about fish-forms?

266 viewsBiologyOther

Fish are so abundant in the ocean (even given how humans overfish, and them often being prey), I kind of wonder

1. Why don’t marine animals converge to a more fish like form? (Aside from say land mammals like whales and dolphines who decided they want to go to the sea)

2. What benefits are there in having a fish-like form in the ocean? It must be evolutionarily advantageous for some reason.

3. Did the first non microscopic multicellular beings have fish-form?

In: Biology

8 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

There is no such thing as a fish. So that is exactly what has happened.

From Wikipedia:

[after] a lifetime studying fish, the biologist Stephen Jay Gould concluded that there was no such thing as a fish. He reasoned that although there are many sea creatures, most of them are not closely related to each other. For example, a salmon is more closely related to a camel than it is to a hagfish.[8]

You are viewing 1 out of 8 answers, click here to view all answers.