Other than cost, is there a reason high end computer gaming rigs don’t use industrial graphics cards (think NVIDIA Quadro, e.g.) for better performance?

964 views

I’ve been looking to build out a gaming PC and came across these types of graphics cards. Obviously, I’m not spending 10k on a graphics card, but I remember using systems with these types of graphics cards when I did treatment planning for cancer radiation therapy because of the amount of ray tracing over thousands of simulations, and I got to wondering why those with deeper pockets than I have dont just go for broke.

In: Technology

2 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

The Quadro and GeForce lines are (generally) based on the same architecture and you likely won’t see an improvement in gaming. The quadro may have some features specific to workstation needs and you are effectively just going to pay a huge premium for those even though you don’t need them. You’ll also likely find that the quadro driver is not at all optimised for gaming, so will very possibly perform worse, and you may find it’s not as simple as just loading a GeForce driver instead.

Anonymous 0 Comments

They would do nothing. Professional graphics cards have 3 things consumer cards do not.
1. More RAM. This will do nothing for you. Even at 4k you are not using the 11Gb on a 2080ti so 16 or 32 will do nothing.
2. ECM RAM. This is needed for complex simulations to detect and correct errors. It would do nothing for graphics.
3. Double precision. This allows you to calculate results out to 64 rather than 32 bytes. I can’t think of anything you could use. Double precision for in gaming. Maybe running the game at like 128k resolution. Displaying the seen at 2000% of the Adobe RGB spectrum?
Double precision is used for super accurate simulations where you need to know the location of say a water molecule to like 30 decimal places.