Simple answer is that machines are much better at doing relatively simple work, so much better that they can outwork several people.
So even if only 10% of the manual labour jobs are mechanized the human workforce looses a lot more than 10% of it’s jobs. Also someone who’s only held low skilled mechanical jobs for most of their life it’s not easy to adapt and learn new skills to compete in that job market.
Shortsightedness. Human resources are the one limiting factor of everything. By freeing up human resources with automation, they can be invested in things that still require humans.
The problem is that this hurts the particular human in the short term, but benefits every other human in the long term.
If you think about it it’s kind of silly that we have to work at all. Most of the necessities are produced without much effort, water and electricity supply is mostly automated, farming at large scales uses heavy machinery, so basic foods are also relatively easy to produce. The population size also isn’t increasing dramatically, so it would be possible to give everyone an apartment. And that is basically all you need to survive…
The world is moving faster and faster but people can’t or refuse to adapt as fast. As lower end jobs are gone, you can’t expect the same amount of people to learn a higher end job like computer programming within a year or even five years. I lost my job due to outsourcing to India. I was lucky to find another career 12 months later.
Latest Answers