If you asked a pure mathematician they’d probably tell you never to write:
> dy = f(x) dx
A “dx” thing should never be on its own. You should write:
> ∫ dy = ∫ f(x) dx
The “∫” goes with the “dx”; they are two parts of the same thing. Both “∫[thing] dx” and “d[thing]/dx” are *operators.* They are things we do to functions. They mean “take the function and integrate it with respect to x” and “take the function and differentiate it with respect to x.”
*However*, there are some situations where they do behave similarly enough to fractions that we can kind of treat them like that. If we are careful.
dy/dx can be defined as a limit of a fraction:
> dy/dx = limit as Δx -> 0 of Δy / Δx
where Δy and Δx are separate things. So in the right circumstances, depending on what that limit is doing, you can treat the dy/dx part like a fraction. But you might upset some pure mathematicians.
Latest Answers