The rear windshield defrosters seem so much more effective. Is it just the lines across the drivers field of view that makes it decidedly unsafe?
In: 17
A new windshield on my 2020 GMC Sierra was like 1k give or take after my OEM got chipped and cracked by a rock down the highway.
So cost has got to come into play in 99% of cases. Simply not a feature customers are going to pay a premium for so it’s not worth it for manufacturers
My Toyota rav4 2022 has defrosting front windshields. Standard, I only discovered it after I got the car
A new windshield on my 2020 GMC Sierra was like 1k give or take after my OEM got chipped and cracked by a rock down the highway.
So cost has got to come into play in 99% of cases. Simply not a feature customers are going to pay a premium for so it’s not worth it for manufacturers
My Toyota rav4 2022 has defrosting front windshields. Standard, I only discovered it after I got the car
My Toyota rav4 2022 has defrosting front windshields. Standard, I only discovered it after I got the car
Lol what?? My rear defroster doesn’t hold a candle to the front
Lol what?? My rear defroster doesn’t hold a candle to the front
Lol what?? My rear defroster doesn’t hold a candle to the front
I think Ford have a patent on it, so for other manufacturers to do it, they’d need to pay a licensing fee to Ford (**if** Ford wanted to let them – they don’t have to).
This is why it’s in Ford vehicles, but not others.
I think Ford have a patent on it, so for other manufacturers to do it, they’d need to pay a licensing fee to Ford (**if** Ford wanted to let them – they don’t have to).
This is why it’s in Ford vehicles, but not others.
Latest Answers