Why do buildings (sometimes) not include seemingly obvious safety measures from initial design?

288 views

I’m often struck by buildings with safety measures that have clearly been added on later, e.g., railings, fences, etc. Like this view from a proposed observation deck on the Chrysler building: https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19989364/Screen_Shot_2020_05_20_at_11.07.25_AM.png (from https://ny.curbed.com/2020/5/20/21264740/chrysler-building-new-observation-deck)

Even the original railing itself looks like it was an afterthought. Why would the original designer think that a knee-height wall was a sufficient safety measure for a terrace?

In: 15

9 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

Why should it have safety measures for a purpose it wasn’t designed for?

It would add both cost and make maintenance more difficult.

Also who said it didn’t meet safety requirements in 1928?

You are viewing 1 out of 9 answers, click here to view all answers.