Why doctors can’t just remove the pain nerves in an area with chronic pain?

744 views

So, there are pain nerves, right? Different from the movement nerves. Normally you want to have functional pain nerves so they can alert your brain to an injury. If someone has, say, arthritis, or a bad joint or bone injury 30 years ago that has long since healed, those nerves are just sounding the alarm 24/7 even though there’s nothing to be done about it. So, since that pain isn’t giving you any new information you can use to help take care of your body, and is actively impeding your life, why not just remove the pain nerves, or cut them off from the nervous system? They are useless at that point for actually reporting things that would impede the mechanical function of that area, so getting rid of them would be a net benefit.

In: Biology

13 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

Had a friend in university with what was then called [Reflex Sypathetic Dystrophy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_regional_pain_syndrome) caused by having her foot crushed.

The pain started as a burning in her foot and moved up her leg. They cut the nerve chain in her knee and it stopped her being able to feel the burning, but her leg also lost the ability to cool itself – she stopped sweating below the cut.

Unfortunately it didn’t prevent the spread of the disease and a year later they cut the nerve chain in her groin. Same side effect – strange clammy not sweaty skin on that leg.

We didn’t stay in touch after university, but I heard she passed from it a couple years later. 🙁

You are viewing 1 out of 13 answers, click here to view all answers.