Why doctors can’t just remove the pain nerves in an area with chronic pain?

748 views

So, there are pain nerves, right? Different from the movement nerves. Normally you want to have functional pain nerves so they can alert your brain to an injury. If someone has, say, arthritis, or a bad joint or bone injury 30 years ago that has long since healed, those nerves are just sounding the alarm 24/7 even though there’s nothing to be done about it. So, since that pain isn’t giving you any new information you can use to help take care of your body, and is actively impeding your life, why not just remove the pain nerves, or cut them off from the nervous system? They are useless at that point for actually reporting things that would impede the mechanical function of that area, so getting rid of them would be a net benefit.

In: Biology

13 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

I believe the nerves to sensation and movement are sometimes the same? I had surgery called selective peripheral denervation for cervical dystonia. ELI5 version: I have a movement disorder that causes my neck to turn right and muscles to contract when they shouldn’t. The doctors cut open my neck and removed large sections of certain nerves so that my neck wouldn’t turn right anymore.

As a result of the surgery, the right turning movement has stopped BUT I also have severely decreased sensation in the back of my head. This isn’t a complication of the surgery, it was a fully anticipated result of the surgery. So I’m assuming that the same nerves that caused the movement also provided sensation, or else they would have left the sensation nerves alone and just removed the movement nerves.

You are viewing 1 out of 13 answers, click here to view all answers.