Why does the Geneva Convention forbid medics from carrying any more than the most basic of self-defense weapons?

358 views

Why does the Geneva Convention forbid medics from carrying any more than the most basic of self-defense weapons?

In: 10147

19 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

The US Solution to this, given that insurgent groups tend not to give a shit about protected status of medical personnel, has been to create a grey area by giving all combat personnel a bit of medical training and equipment and calling them “Combat Life Savers”. Give every soldier the ability to stabilize an injured comrade, while maintaining full legal combatant status and thus be allowed to be fully armed.

Does it work well in disorganized insurgent warfare? Yes, it seems so. Will it work in organized warfare with another nation? Remains to be seen, but probably not given higher rates of casualties requiring more medical attention and more drastically impacting your units output down range since it’s full rate soldiers playing doctor instead of specialized soldiers.

You are viewing 1 out of 19 answers, click here to view all answers.