Why is nuking hazardous asteroids not a viable option? I’d rather be hit by smaller pebbles instead of an actual rock

221 views

Thanks everyone for answering

In: 9

20 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

>I’d rather be hit by smaller pebbles instead of an actual rock

That’s not the trade

Your choices are get hit with a big cannon ball or a blast from the biggest shotgun imaginable

The choice is irrelevant as the end result is largely the same

A single large impact can actually be less damaging because so much energy is wasted going up and down. A 2 km rock would enter with about 20,000 Megatons of energy. A 200 meter rock still enters with 200 Megatons of energy and now you have dozens of them which will ensure a more uniform devastation across the impact region

We shifted from building bigger and bigger nukes to lots of 100-250 kT warheads *because* multiple smaller explosions are more effective than a single large one. If you want to double the blast radius you need 8x the energy

You are viewing 1 out of 20 answers, click here to view all answers.