Why is the kinetic energy of an object proportional to the square of the velocity? I’ve read many explanations online but I still don’t get it.

156 views

First, I’ve never taken a physics class or attended highschool before, hence the ELI5. I’ve read many explanations but it doesn’t really make intuitive sense to me. For example (assuming there’s no air resistance / drag), let’s say I was traveling in a car going 120 mph and I wanted to decelerate to 90 mph. This would take four times as much energy than going from 30 mph to 0.

But let’s say there were two cars traveling at 120 mph. The car next to me decelerates to 90 mph, but I’m still going 120. From my point of view, the car next to me just started going 30 mph in the opposite direction. Why would this require 4 times as much energy than if both cars were just stationary, and the car next to me actually started going 30 mph in the opposite direction?

And, let’s say we’re both standing on earth. One person at the north pole and one at the equator. Both of us throw a ball, but the ball at the equator is already traveling at something like 1,000 mph due to the earth’s rotation. Shouldn’t throwing a ball eastward then require way more energy to go from 1,000 to say 1,020 mph, than the person throwing the ball at the north pole who just has to accelerate it from 0 mph to 20 mph?

In: 3

6 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

Let’s chose as reference the a point on a road. And let’s accelerate a car. I assume you know the equations. Let them assume we use the car’s engine to generate the force, and this engine is a combustion one, and we never shift gear, fix gear ratio.

We start the reasoning with: Speed = time * force / mass.

It happens that the car will travel faster and faster while accelerating, covering more and more distance per second. Distance=time squared * force / mass.

I will keep using force/mass as a substitute for acceleration.

Now, let’s say you push ed the car with 1000force, for 1000 distance, it will get to 10speed. To get the same car to the speed of 20, it will take twice the time.

But how much distance it took? To get to 20 speed instead of 10 speed, we will need twice the time. Again, distance=time squared*force/mass. So we will cover 4 times more distance as 2time squared is gives 4time as a result.

Breaking it down to the combustion in the engine, while the car gets faster and faster, the engine spins faster and faster, burning fuel faster and faster. There will be a fix ratio between engine and wheel, for each revolution of the wheel there will be a fix number of combustion cycles, all burning the same fuel. Pause it at any point of the travel: you can see for each meter of road, you burn a fix amount of fuel.

If getting to twice the speed covers four time more road, therefore burning four time more fuel.

This means the car has received 4 times more energy to get to 20speed compared to the energy it takes to get to 10speed.

From energy pov, the time it took doesn’t matter, what matters is what you burn to get there and for how much distance you had to burn.

The car’s kinetic energy is nothing else that the burned fuel energy. And the amount is determined by how much force for how many meters It traveled under that force.

To recap: kinetic energy=“fuel used” to get the object to that speed.

(speed=force * time /mass, transform this you have:

force= speed * mass / time.

Distance= speed * time)

SO HERE WE ARE: Kinetic energy = “fuel used” = force * distance = (speed * mass / time) * (speed * time) = speed * speed * mass / ~~time / time~~= mass * speed squared

Hope this example helped visualize it. The rest of your question is answered just by changing the reference point. Law applies the same.

You are viewing 1 out of 6 answers, click here to view all answers.